[wg11] RE: Use cases for XML/P28e2

[Guenter Staub]

Dave,

I want to point out that AP214 have also requirements with respect to
P28ed2. We plan to prepare a summary of our findings/issues and to present
this overview during the below mentioned session.


Rgds,
Günter


PDTec GmbH ------------------------------------------
Dr. Guenter Staub             Fon:   +49-721-61844-11
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 7           Fax:   +49-721-61844-19
D-76131 Karlsruhe             Email: staub at pdtec.de
Germany                       Web:   www.pdtec.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Loffredo [mailto:loffredo at steptools.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:39 PM
> To: wg3 at tc184-sc4.org; wg11 at steptools.com; expressIF at tc184-sc4.org;
> step-imp at steptools.com; step-manufacturing at steptools.com; wg12 at tc184-
> sc4.org; xmlsc4 at nist.gov
> Subject: Use cases for XML/P28e2
> 
> 
> 
> Howard> I suggest that WG11 takes the lead in scheduling a session
> Howard> during the Bath meeting.
> 
> The session will be Wednesday 10:30-12pm.  See below.
> 
> Standards tend to be written by the folks who show up.  The WG11
> projects typically draw few participants, so these discussions have
> been very helpful in uncovering new requirements and viewpoints.
> 
> In that light, we will structure the meeting to make sure we hear and
> can address the requirements of the AP developers.  From the voices I
> have heard so far, the groups who seem to have requirements are:
> 
> 	- AP-239/PLCS
> 	- AP-238
> 	- AP-210
> 	- Part 28 team
> 
> Gerry and I suggest a format whereby each group has 10 minutes to
> outline their requirements, followed by an open 40 minute discussion
> to explore a course forward for addressing those needs.
> 
> The session will be Wednesday 10:30-12pm as describe.  This slot was
> previously scheduled for the implementors forum so hopefully we can
> draw participants from the WG3, WG11, WG12, and implementor groups.
> 
> WG11 projects often take great pains to support the "entire EXPRESS
> community" which presumably includes private, stand-alone or ad-hoc
> EXPRESS models.  This is certainly of merit, and not to be ignored.
> 
> However, I remind the members of our small working group that the
> widest use of WG11 standards are in the context of APs.  An AP is not
> necessarily just "one more EXPRESS model" and we must give equal, if
> not greater, weight to these needs as well.
> 
> 				- Dave (WG11 Convenor)
> 
>