Issues on draft Exp2 (2)

[Pascal Huau]

Jochen , Phil,

two other issues:
- Annex J mentions Express-G in its title but there is no Express-G diagram in the annex
- annex K: it is not consistent to have in the normative section the specification of Abstract Supertype and Supertype constructs and that each of these constructs "is deprecated". "Omission of language version identifier" is not deprecated as this feature is being removed.
- annex L: could you please use some examples taken from the existing modules


regards,
Pascal Huau
Association GOSET
107,111 avenue Clemenceau
92000 Nanterre
France
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Pascal Huau 
  To: Jochen Haenisch ; Phil Spiby 
  Cc: WG11 ; Dave Loffredo 
  Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:42 AM
  Subject: Issues on draft Exp2


  Jochen , Phil,


  Thanks for the draft of Exp2 that helps a lot.

  Some minor issues:
  - Clause 7.6 (language version identification) should be removed or amended on the basis of Stockholm decision
  - grammar rules in clause 9.2 are not consistent with grammar rule in clause 9.2.3 (and it would be better to have only once these rules rather than than having them 3 or 4 times in 9.2.x )
  - clause 9.7 should be located much closer to clause 9.2.3


  One major one (I do not know whether it has already been discussed):
  - in clause 9.2.3.4, I am quite surprised to read that in a subtype an attribute of type Generic_entity can be redeclared in a Generic_entity select. This is inconsistent with the 1st rule in that clause that states that an attribute may be redeclared in a specialization of the original entity data type. 


  regards,
  Pascal Huau
  Association GOSET
  107,111 avenue Clemenceau
  92000 Nanterre
  France
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.steptools.com/pipermail/wg11/attachments/20020704/ab142b85/attachment.html