[step-manufacturing] Fwd: RE: ISO Industry Day Proposed Agenda
Martin Hardwick
hardwick at steptools.com
Wed Aug 23 14:17:34 EDT 2006
>Subject: RE: ISO Industry Day Proposed Agenda
>To: "Yunas, Akram" <Ayunas at aiag.org>
>Cc: danebarrager at asidatamyte.com, "Donald Galway" <dgalway12000 at yahoo.com>,
> gallan1 at ford.com, "Martin Hardwick" <hardwick at steptools.com>,
> "John Horst" <horst at cme.nist.gov>, jec12 at daimlerchrysler.com,
> "Larry Snowden" <LSnowden at ogihara.com>, rbsharah at ford.com,
> rdw5 at daimlerchrysler.com, "Steve Peca" <SPeca at ogihara.com>,
> step-manufacturing at steptools.com, Larry.Maggiano at mitutoyo.com
>X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 September 26, 2003
>From: Robert.Brown at mitutoyo.com
>Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:50:43 -0500
>X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on
>AURORA-NOTES6/Mitutoyo/US(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at
> 08/23/2006 12:50:44 PM
>X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
>X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
>X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Aug 23 13:50:59 2006
>X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.6824
>X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 216 chance of being spam
>X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
>X-DSPAM-Signature: 14,44ec9583109934305316223
>
>Hello Akram:
>Can you provide the entire agenda, please? As I read, there are more days
>to this symposium than what we currently have exposure to.
>I think this would help us understand the broader context and would go a
>long way to shaping the best fit of our topics and material.
>BTW: I think the end-to-end data flow discussion that Martin refers to is
>definitely something that should be addressed. As has been mentioned
>before, the NIST Metrology Interoperability Summit, lacked participation
>from Machine Tool (i.e. production) people and it is critical to understand
>and incorporate the OMAC work into the technology roadmap.
>Best regards,
>
>Robert Brown
>Program Manager
>MeasurLink Development
>Mitutoyo America Corporation
>Phone: 630-723-3581
>please visit @ www.measurlink.com
>
>**********************************************************************
>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
>the sender immediately.
>**********************************************************************
>
>
>
>
> "Yunas, Akram"
> <Ayunas at aiag.org>
> To
> 08/23/2006 12:07 "Martin Hardwick"
> PM <hardwick at steptools.com>,
> <step-manufacturing at steptools.com>
> cc
> <rbsharah at ford.com>,
> <rdw5 at daimlerchrysler.com>,
> <gallan1 at ford.com>,
> <jec12 at daimlerchrysler.com>, "Steve
> Peca" <SPeca at ogihara.com>, "Larry
> Snowden" <LSnowden at ogihara.com>,
> <danebarrager at asidatamyte.com>,
> "John Horst" <horst at cme.nist.gov>,
> <robert.brown at mitutoyo.com>,
> "Donald Galway"
> <dgalway12000 at yahoo.com>
> Subject
> RE: ISO Industry Day Proposed
> Agenda
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Martin: You already heard from John Horst. I$B!G(Bd like to leave the agenda
>finalization to my Committee Leadership.
>Guys, Please review Martin$B!G(Bs comments and respond. I am
>flexible as to what
>the final agenda looks like. The key take away from the meeting I want is
>for the automotive industry to understand where ISO is today and vice
>versa$B!D(B related to Manufacturing/Metrology standards and future direction.
>
>Maybe I should arrange a conference call between the Metrology Project Team
>leaders and Martin to address this issue?
>
>Your thoughts please.
>
>
>Akram.
>
>
>From: Martin Hardwick [mailto:hardwick at steptools.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:46 AM
>To: Yunas, Akram; step-manufacturing at steptools.com
>Cc: rbsharah at ford.com; rdw5 at daimlerchrysler.com; gallan1 at ford.com;
>jec12 at daimlerchrysler.com; Steve Peca; Larry Snowden;
>danebarrager at asidatamyte.com; John Horst; robert.brown at mitutoyo.com; Donald
>Galway
>Subject: Re: ISO Industry Day Proposed Agenda
>
>
>Hi Akram,
>
>We received criticism in Toulouse because our STEP-Manufacturing
>presentations went on for too long. I would like to avoid this problem in
>Hershey so I am wondering if there is a way that we can make the second
>half of the agenda more collaborative.
>
>In particular, I know a lot of industry is becoming frustrated because
>there is no IMPLEMENTED standard for defining tolerance information. In
>STEP-Manufacturing we need these tolerances for AP-238 closed loop
>machining, and AP-219 results of dimensional inspection. I expect you need
>these tolerances for several of your metrology standards as well!
>
>The level of frustration has reached a level where there is now interest in
>OMAC and STEP-Manufacturing for putting together an HMI/API for creating
>the tolerance data. We would use the HMI to create the (XML) tolerance data
>for closed loop machining applications. If the AIAG metrology team were
>able to use the same HMI to create data for dimensional inspection then we
>might be able to use the synergy to encourage the proper implementation of
>the required data within CAD, CNC and CMM systems.
>
>Could we use the second half of the day to discuss this in more detail?
>Perhaps you could bring a representative part to the meeting so that we
>could discuss how to define the required information. We can do the same
>for a closed loop machining STEP-NC part. I think the meeting would be a
>great success if we could conclude the day with a list of say the top 10
>items that need to be implemented in the new HMI/API to cover 80% of the
>cases and enable its use in seed applications for machining and inspection.
>
>
>Martin
>
>
>
>At 02:53 PM 8/22/2006, Yunas, Akram wrote:
>
>Hi Martin: I was able to make some time today and thought I should get you
>the AIAG proposed agenda for the Industry Day.
>
>I think Wednesday October 25 will work for us as you guys have a very full
>agenda on other days. I recommend scheduling the AIAG agenda after lunch
>for continuity and this also gives us a chance to be able to fly in and out
>the same day.
>
>I am excited about the opportunity of getting the automotive industry back
>in the loop on our TC 184 activities. The panel discussion at the end
>should provide us with the chance to have some open dialogue and maybe
>establish some future activities where we can collaborate closely.
>
>
>Please confirm if this is workable. My volunteers need to put this on their
>calendars.
>
>Kind Regards,
>
>Akram
>NOTICE: This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended solely for the
>use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information
>that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure. If
>the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you
>are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
>this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the
>original message at the listed email address and then delete the message.
>Thank You.
>
>
>NOTICE: This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended solely for the
>use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information
>that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure. If
>the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you
>are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
>this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the
>original message at the listed email address and then delete the message.
>Thank You.
>
>
>
>
>!DSPAM:14,44ec9583109934305316223!
More information about the step-manufacturing
mailing list