[step-manufacturing] Fwd: RE: ISO Industry Day Proposed Agenda

[Martin Hardwick]

>Subject: RE: ISO Industry Day Proposed Agenda
>Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:07:30 -0400
>X-MS-Has-Attach:
>X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
>Thread-Topic: ISO Industry Day Proposed Agenda
>Thread-Index: AcbGyrNhyIFIP5kpT4+AfXkVglCJJAACwPQw
>From: "Yunas, Akram" <Ayunas at aiag.org>
>To: "Martin Hardwick" <hardwick at steptools.com>,
>         <step-manufacturing at steptools.com>
>Cc: <rbsharah at ford.com>, <rdw5 at daimlerchrysler.com>, <gallan1 at ford.com>,
>         <jec12 at daimlerchrysler.com>, "Steve Peca" <SPeca at ogihara.com>,
>         "Larry Snowden" <LSnowden at ogihara.com>, 
> <danebarrager at asidatamyte.com>,
>         "John Horst" <horst at cme.nist.gov>, <robert.brown at mitutoyo.com>,
>         "Donald Galway" <dgalway12000 at yahoo.com>
>X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
>X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
>X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
>X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Aug 23 13:11:41 2006
>X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.5834
>X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 141 chance of being spam
>X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
>X-DSPAM-Signature: 14,44ec8c4d91341414221300
>
>Martin: You already heard from John Horst. I’d 
>like to leave the agenda finalization to my Committee Leadership.
>Guys, Please review Martin’s comments and 
>respond. I am flexible as to what the final 
>agenda looks like. The key take away from the 
>meeting I want is for the automotive industry to 
>understand where ISO is today and vice versa
 
>related to Manufacturing/Metrology standards and future direction.
>
>Maybe I should arrange a conference call between 
>the Metrology Project Team leaders and Martin to address this issue?
>
>Your thoughts please.
>
>
>Akram.
>
>
>----------
>From: Martin Hardwick [mailto:hardwick at steptools.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:46 AM
>To: Yunas, Akram; step-manufacturing at steptools.com
>Cc: rbsharah at ford.com; rdw5 at daimlerchrysler.com; 
>gallan1 at ford.com; jec12 at daimlerchrysler.com; 
>Steve Peca; Larry Snowden; 
>danebarrager at asidatamyte.com; John Horst; 
>robert.brown at mitutoyo.com; Donald Galway
>Subject: Re: ISO Industry Day Proposed Agenda
>
>
>Hi Akram,
>
>We received criticism in Toulouse because our 
>STEP-Manufacturing presentations went on for too 
>long.  I would like to avoid this problem in 
>Hershey so I am wondering if there is a way that 
>we can make the second half of the agenda more collaborative.
>
>In particular, I know a lot of industry is 
>becoming frustrated because there is no 
>IMPLEMENTED standard for defining tolerance 
>information. In STEP-Manufacturing we need these 
>tolerances for AP-238 closed loop machining, and 
>AP-219 results of dimensional inspection. I 
>expect you need these tolerances for several of 
>your metrology standards as well!
>
>The level of frustration has reached a level 
>where there is now interest in OMAC and 
>STEP-Manufacturing for putting together an 
>HMI/API for creating the tolerance data. We 
>would use the HMI to create the (XML) tolerance 
>data for closed loop machining applications. If 
>the AIAG metrology team were able to use the 
>same HMI to create data for dimensional 
>inspection then we might be able to use the 
>synergy to encourage the proper implementation 
>of the required data within CAD, CNC and CMM systems.
>
>Could we use the second half of the day to 
>discuss this in more detail? Perhaps you could 
>bring a representative part to the meeting so 
>that we could discuss how to define the required 
>information. We can do the same for a closed 
>loop machining STEP-NC part. I think the meeting 
>would be a great success if we could conclude 
>the day with a list of say the top 10 items that 
>need to be implemented in the new HMI/API to 
>cover 80% of the cases and enable its use in 
>seed applications for machining and inspection.
>
>Martin
>
>
>
>At 02:53 PM 8/22/2006, Yunas, Akram wrote:
>
>Hi Martin: I was able to make some time today 
>and thought I should get you the AIAG proposed agenda for the Industry Day.
>
>I think Wednesday October 25 will work for us as 
>you guys have a very full agenda on other days. 
>I recommend scheduling the AIAG agenda after 
>lunch for continuity and this also gives us a 
>chance to be able to fly in and out the same day.
>
>I am excited about the opportunity of getting 
>the automotive industry back in the loop on our 
>TC 184 activities. The panel discussion at the 
>end should provide us with the chance to have 
>some open dialogue and maybe establish some 
>future activities where we can collaborate closely.
>
>
>Please confirm if this is workable. My 
>volunteers need to put this on their calendars.
>
>Kind Regards,
>
>Akram
>NOTICE: This e-mail (including any attachments) 
>is intended solely for the use of the individual 
>to whom it is addressed and may contain 
>information that is privileged, confidential or 
>otherwise exempt from disclosure. If the reader 
>of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or 
>the employee or agent responsible for delivering 
>the message to the intended recipient, you are 
>hereby notified that any dissemination, 
>distribution, or copying of this communication 
>is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
>this communication in error, please immediately 
>notify us by replying to the original message at 
>the listed email address and then delete the message. Thank You.
>NOTICE: This e-mail (including any attachments) 
>is intended solely for the use of the individual 
>to whom it is addressed and may contain 
>information that is privileged, confidential or 
>otherwise exempt from disclosure. If the reader 
>of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or 
>the employee or agent responsible for delivering 
>the message to the intended recipient, you are 
>hereby notified that any dissemination, 
>distribution, or copying of this communication 
>is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
>this communication in error, please immediately 
>notify us by replying to the original message at 
>the listed email address and then delete the 
>message. Thank You. !DSPAM:14,44ec8c4d91341414221300!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.steptools.com/pipermail/step-manufacturing/attachments/20060823/f2ed8837/attachment.htm>