WG11 Minutes from Poitiers
Dave Loffredo
loffredo at steptools.com
Mon Nov 10 15:39:32 EST 2003
These minutes from Poitiers have been posted to the SC4 document
archive as wg11n227, along with the other N-documents referenced
herein. The following URL will also get you there.
http://www.tc184-sc4.org/SC4_Open/SC4_and_Working_Groups/WG11/N-DOCS/Files/wg11n227_poitiers_minutes.txt
============================================================
TC184/SC4/WG11/N227 Poitiers Minutes
2003-10-26 to 2003-10-31
Opening Plenary Mon 10:30-Noon
ATTENDEES
Jochen Haenisch NO jochen.haenisch at epmtech.jotne.com
David Price UK david.price at eurostep.com
Ed Barkmeyer US edbark at nist.gov
Jochen Fritz US jfritz at steptools.com
David Loffredo US loffredo at steptools.com
Heidi Preston US hpreston at ebmail.gdeb.com
PROGRESS AND STATUS OF WG11 PROJECTS
Part 11 Edition 2 - status 50.00
Reporting - Jochen Haenisch
Submitted to ISO for FDIS ballot circulation in August.
Got word from ISO that they will be mailing the ballot to
member countries on 2003-11-14.
On 2003-10-15, some minor editorial back and forth on the PDF,
but ISO appears to be going forward with the ballot anyway. No
response from Peter Wilson so we need to find someone with a
LaTeX installation to make the changes.
The Secretariat is still listing SEDS as open for this part.
Jochen needs to provide the details of SEDS closures to the
Secretariat so they can be closed out.
Need to begin TC for language identifier, short to long
refinements that were identified from implementation tests
(rule for handling of referenced entity data types to
constraing to dependant instantiation -- missing type
label for local declaration of generics within functions)
A workshop was held on E2 Short to E1 Long Implementation.
Minutes available as wg11n226. Two vendors participated in
short-to-long tool validation, EPM and PDTec. The tools have
been revised to implement Part11e2 Annex G.
Prior to the meeting, the 203e2 mim longforms generated by
each tool were compared and seven differences in tool behavior
were identified. At the workshop, agreement was reached on
resolutions for differences.
The plan is for the tools to be revised by 2003-11-15, then
the results will be analyzed by 2003-11-30.
Part 12 - published 1997-07-15
Part 14 - status 40.60
No Report
DIS ballot ran from 2002-04-02 to 2002-10-25
Passed with 100% approval, so no FDIS needed.
Ballot results available in sc4n1387.
In San Diego the project reached agreement on resolution for
all comments, and updated the document with resolutions for 39
of the issues during the meeting. Develoment of the text for
remaining 12 fixes is currently ongoing.
When complete, circulate updated document for a 4-week wg11
review before sending to ISO for publication.
Part 21e2 - No report, published 2002-01-15
Part 22 - No report, published 1998-12-15
Confirmed on 5 Year Review
SEDS listed as open
311, 340, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401,
402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 409, 497
Part 23 - No report, published 2000-12-01
Part 24 - No report, published 2001-12-15
Part 25 - status 30.92
Reporting -- David Price
Meeting Tuesday 1-5 to resolve comments
Unanimously passed second TS ballot (see sc4n1584)
Comments from Germany (10), Japan (28), UK (1)
Reached agreement on resolution of all comments. Accepted
almost every change. Deferred part of one comment that was
the same as the "lean mapping".
Will prepare new document for publication, anticipate ready in
one month or so. Will circulate for 4-week wg11 review before
sending to ISO for publication.
At meeting, discussed second edition NWI to deal with UML v2,
EXPRESS v2, and "lean mapping". Also discussed the scope of
the second edition NWI. Open questions include whether to
include MOF or UML profiles for EXPRESS, and whether to do
the standardization in OMG.
Part 26 - No report, cancelled
Part 27 - No report, published 2000-11-15
Part 28 - status 30.92
Reporting -- Heidi Preston
Meeting all week
Held bi-weekly telecons for past six months to prepare CD
ballot document. Preliminary document (wg11n223) circulated
in September.
At meeting, closed 29 action items and edited/reviewed 30% of
the document. Identified three new issues that are currently
open and will be resolved via teleconference. Captured and
assigned list of editorial action items.
Schedule three conference calls to work remaining issues.
Hold a final walk through before sending the document through
the checklists for signoff. Anticipate ready for CD ballot by
January 15, 2004.
Part 29 - No report, cancelled
Part 31 - No report, published 1994-12-31 status 90.93
Part 32 - No report, published 2000-01-04
Under 5-year Review
Part 33 - No report, cancelled
Part 34 - No report, published 2001-02-01
Part 35 - status 50.99
No Report
Document updated with Stockholm fixes. Circulated for
a 4-wk wg11 review. No issues raised. Forwarded for TS
publication.
On 2003-10-28, ISO Geneva sent back a proof copy for us to
check for correctness. Lothar reviewed and is happy so Geneva
should publish the document very soon.
NEW BUSINESS
At open technical forum, David Leal discussed EXPRESS to OWL (Web
Ontology Language, W3C candidate recommendation) mappings. David
Price will also discussed this at the Industrial Data on the Web
meetings (Wed). There may be scope for and SC4 standard mapping in
this area.
Mats Lindeblad led a discussion Wednesday 10:30-12 to investigate the
potential for a 20-series part for binary exchange of EXPRESS-defined
data. Some requirements that are driving this interest:
- Verbosity of Part 21 (seen with AP-209 FEA data)
- Desire for random access to very large data sets
Minutes of this discussion are available in wg11n224.
Discussion attendees:
David Leal UK
David Price UK david.price at eurostep.com
David Loffredo US loffredo at steptools.com
Georg Siebes US
Mats Lindeblad SE
More information about the wg11
mailing list