Unused selects in SHTOLO
Ed Barkmeyer
edbark at nist.gov
Tue Oct 14 08:33:29 EDT 2003
Dave Price asks:
> Are you asking for a change to the EXPRESS LRM itself or a change in the
> EXPRESS tools as a convenience?
I don't see how this request relates to the EXPRESS LRM. I believe that the
idea of a "long-form schema" is implicit in the definition of interfacing
(clause 11) in 10303-11, not explicit.
And the effect that Rob asks for is not "local to a USE/REFERENCE statement";
rather it is global to the resulting "long-form" schema. What we really mean
is: "Include the things I include by name in any USE/REFERENCE statement, and
then include anything else that would be implicitly interfaced by them, but
nothing else." I don't want the EXPRESS LRM to say anything like that.
-Ed
P.S. I think this is another example of my favorite corollary to the Goedel
theorem: "You can't get everything you want without getting things you don't want."
--
Edward J. Barkmeyer Email: edbark at nist.gov
National Institute of Standards & Technology
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8260 Tel: +1 301-975-3528
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8260 FAX: +1 301-975-4694
"The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST,
and have not been reviewed by any Government authority."
More information about the wg11
mailing list