Identification of Express Version
Wilson, Peter R
peter.r.wilson at boeing.com
Mon May 6 12:53:04 EDT 2002
Dave,
I don't see why a TC will automatically lead to a change in the ASN.1
identifier. Surely it is up to the authors of the TC to decide whether or
not to change it. I would expect that editorial changes would have no effect
on the identifier as they would not affect an EXPRESS parser. It is only
changes that a parser has to be aware of that would require a change to the
identifier.
Peter W.
Dr Peter R. Wilson
Boeing Commercial Airplanes
PO Box 3707, MS 6H-AF, Seattle, WA 98124-2207
(Package Delivery: MS 6H-AF, 1601 E. Valley Frontage Road, Renton, WA 98055)
Tel: (425) 237-3506, Fax: (425) 237-3428
Email: peter.r.wilson at boeing.com
--------------------------------
Any opinions expressed above are personal;
they shall not be construed as representative of any organisation.
--------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Loffredo [mailto:loffredo at steptools.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:03 AM
> To: edbark at nist.gov
> Cc: wg11 at steptools.com
> Subject: Re: Identification of Express Version
>
>
>
> Ed,
>
> If I can summarize your two points as follows:
>
> #1 -- the ASN.1 identifier will stay the same from draft
> status to IS
>
> Perhaps, but that is not the key issue. A TC will change the ASN.1
> identifier, even if there are no technical changes to the spec. So
> the issue may not hit now, but it eventually will.
>
>
> #2 -- the ASN.1 identifier is needed to separate E1 from E2
> schemas.
>
> I completely agree that something is needed to separate the two, but
> is the ASN.1 identifer too fragile for this purpose? THIS is the real
> question. As shown above, the ASN.1 identifier may change because of
> editorial fixes that have nothing to do with new language features.
>
> - Dave
>
>
More information about the wg11
mailing list