Part28: schema population text from Part 21 Annex F

[Howard Mason]

Just to avoid any speculative approach to standard processes - at FDIS, countries 
can vote either "Yes" or "No with comments".

See ISO Form 17, which is the one that countries need to fill in.

Howard




david.price at eurostep.com on 23/07/2001 16:20:55
Please respond to david.price at eurostep.com@INTERNET at wtgw
To:	loffredo at steptools.com@INTERNET at wtgw
cc:	hardwick at steptools.com@INTERNET at wtgw, edbark at cme.nist.gov@INTERNET at wtgw, 
pascalhuau at compuserve.com@INTERNET at wtgw, wg11 at steptools.com@INTERNET at wtgw 

Subject:	RE: Part28: schema population text from Part 21 Annex F

                   *** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 
     Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 


Dave L,

On the FDIS ballot, I think countries can vote NO and submit comments -
never wrote an FDIS comment myself though so am not positive. I don't think
you can do anything about comments if it passes unless you are correcting an
outright error or addressing a small editorial concern.  If you do more I
think you have to do another FDIS but I'm sure that's not needed here.

In any case, it sounds like this issue is under control. Please let the Part
28 project know the exact language you will add so it can be re-used.

Thanks,
David P

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg11 at steptools.com [mailto:owner-wg11 at steptools.com]On
Behalf Of Dave Loffredo
Sent: 23 July 2001 15:46
To: david.price at eurostep.com
Cc: hardwick at steptools.com; edbark at cme.nist.gov;
pascalhuau at compuserve.com; wg11 at steptools.com
Subject: Re: Part28: schema population text from Part 21 Annex F


>>>>> "David" == David Price <david.price at eurostep.com> writes:

David> That's fine except that Dave may not have the chance. Geneva
David> often creates the IS with no SC4 involvement unless there are
David> ballot comment raised pointing out errors in the FDIS. Perhaps
David> a ballot comment, instead of a SEDS, would be the right thing
David> to submit?

Geneva wants me to create the IS.  They don't want to change
the headers from FDIS to IS and they had a couple of other minor
editorial things.  And correct me if I'm wrong, but there are no
ballot comments for an FDIS ... straight YES or NO.

						- Dave









********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************