[wg11] Latest draft of Part 21 Edition 3 ready for quality checks
Thomas Thurman
thomas.r.thurman at imonmail.com
Mon Jun 24 17:11:03 EDT 2013
Martin,
Comments below.
Tom
1-Line 130 should be clause 3.5.
2-"Anchor and reference section encodings" (current 6.6) should precede "anchor section encoding" (current 6.5).
3-line 661 'term' should be 'terms'.
4-line 699 'terms' should be 'term'.
5-line 743 definition appears to be obsolete as anchor covers more than entity instances?
6-line 774 definition also appears to need updating.
7-line 1581: "..The integer spaces for the two types of names cannot overlap" would be clearer as "The integer spaces for the two types of names are not permitted to overlap"
8 clause 6.4.4.2 Value names: I could find no examples in annex K. Be more specific as to the location of the example.
9-6.5.2 EXPRESS constant. An example showing the use of the object identifier to represent schema version would be useful to include here. (see also 9.2.7)
line 2282: the following is ambiguous:
If a time stamp is included and its value describes a date and time after the date and time in the file_name of the header of the referenced exchange structure, then the referenced exchange structure has not been changed since this time stamp was created.
replace with
If a time stamp is included and its value describes a date and time after the date and time in the file_name of the header of the referenced exchange structure, then the referenced exchange structure has not been changed since this exchange structure was created.
line 2313: "data and time" should be "date and time"
line 2317: The clause "validity of the time_stamp_text in the referenced file" is undefined.
clause 9.2.4: change the note into an example. There are no guarantees that a future version of the exchange structure will have the missing data.
clause 10.1: It appears that a value_instance can be declared only in a reference section. It would be best to make that explicit, if true.
clause H.4 The note should explain why the exchange structure is conformant to conformance option {4,1}.
=======end comments========
>On Jun 21, 2013, at 4:16 PM6/21/13, Martin Hardwick wrote:
> All,
>
> A new draft of Part 21 Edition 3 has been posted to the web site: http://www.steptools.com/library/standard/p21e3_dis_paris.html
>
> This draft is believed to be complete and will be submitted to ISO as soon as the necessary quality checks have been completed.
>
> Therefore, if you find any errors it is because they were missed, not because we have not yet gotten to them, so please let us know.
>
> Martin Hardwick
> Editor Part 21 Edition 3
> _______________________________________________
> wg11 mailing list
> wg11 at steptools.com
> http://lists.steptools.com/mailman/listinfo/wg11
More information about the wg11
mailing list