[wg11] Re: Part 28 in Seattle?

[Suzuki Masaru]

Hi folks,

I will be present in the Seattle Meeting.
So I will be able to participate the ballot resolution review session 
if it does not conflict with other sessions I have to attend.

Regards,

Masaru Suzuki

------------------------------------------------
Masaru Suzuki
Research Director
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
Kikai Shinko Kaikan Bldg. 3F
3-5-8 Shibakouen, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0011, Japan
E-mail : suzuki at ecom.jp
TEL : +81-3-3436-7523   FAX : +81-3-3436-7570
URL : http://www.ecom.jp
------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wg11-bounces at steptools.com 
> [mailto:wg11-bounces at steptools.com] On Behalf Of Ed Barkmeyer
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 2:12 AM
> To: Dave Loffredo
> Cc: SC4 WG11
> Subject: [wg11] Re: Part 28 in Seattle?
> 
> 
> Dave Loffredo wrote:
> 
> > I have not yet heard from anyone regarding this ...
> > 
> > 					   - Dave
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> >>From loffredo Fri Sep 03 13:33:57 -0400 2004
> > From: Dave Loffredo <loffredo at steptools.com>
> > To: edbark at nist.gov
> > CC: hpreston at ebmail.gdeb.com, staub at pdtec.de,
> > 	david.price at eurostep.com, Jochen.Haenisch at epmtech.jotne.com,
> > 	Masaru.Suzuki at unisys.co.jp, abf at cme.nist.gov,
> > 	hardwick at steptools.com, bgischne at ebmail.gdeb.com
> > ...
> > Ed> I expect that Heidi et al. will have posted a "proposed DIS" of
> > Ed> Part 28 to the server by 15 September, after which Heidi will be
> > Ed> taking a rewarding leave of absence.  I would suggest we
> > Ed> (i.e. you) schedule some official "WG11 review" of that draft in
> > Ed> Seattle, prior to releasing that document, or its immediate
> > Ed> successor, to DIS-FDIS ballot.
> > 
> > Hi Ed, I am certainly happy to schedule any meeting or 
> review session
> > that the Part 28 team would like to hold.  What day/time is best and
> > who will be leading the review?
> 
> 1) Because of funding limitations and other commitments, NIST can 
> provide no further resources for the development of Part 28 after 15 
> October 2004.
> 
> 2) After discussion with Heidi, I now believe it is unlikely that a 
> complete DIS draft, incorporating text for all agreed-on 
> ballot comment 
> resolutions, will be available before she goes on maternity leave.
> 
> 3) It is desirable that an interim editor be appointed.  If 
> no interim 
> editor is appointed, it is likely that Part 28 v2 will go into limbo, 
> awaiting commitment of resources to complete the DIS.
> 
> 4) If a number of the NB representatives will be present in 
> Seattle, it 
> would be useful to schedule a session to ensure that the proposed 
> resolutions are satisfactory, and possibly to develop/repair explicit 
> text for them.  Heidi referred to this as a "continuation of 
> the Groton 
> Editing meeting".
> 
> 5) If a number of the NB representatives will be present in 
> Seattle, and 
> believe such a meeting worthwhile, I would be willing to chair that 
> meeting.  If, however, an interim editor is appointed, s/he 
> may better 
> chair such a meeting.
> 
> 6) If, on the other hand, Japan, Norway, Sweden, and the 
> United Kingdom 
> (the NBs who commented on the CD) would not be represented at such a 
> meeting, it would be reduced to a working session of such technical 
> experts as may be present, and it is not clear that that has 
> much value.
> 
> 4 hours on any of the days is acceptable to NIST.  (If there 
> is need for 
> additional technical discussion, we will find a time and place to 
> continue.)  I prefer that the meeting not conflict with the 
> Part 25 v2 
> session.
> 
> Related topic, in expectaion of imminent change of the guard:
> 
> For the plenary, I recommend that SC4 WG11 acknowledge 
> Electric Boat's 
> unflagging commitment of resources, both technical and 
> editorial, to the 
> development of an XML representation standard for the 
> standard exchange 
> schemas developed in SC4, and specifically acknowledge the personal 
> contribution of Heidi Preston to this effort, as Editor of 
> Part 28 v2, 
> whose only reason for abandoning us now is that she has truly more 
> important commitments!
> 
> If I am in Seattle at the appropriate time, I would be happy to make 
> this motion in person.  But if not, I would be grateful to 
> the Convenor 
> if he could find a willing participant to do so in my stead.
> 
> -Ed
> 
> -- 
> Edward J. Barkmeyer                        Email: edbark at nist.gov
> National Institute of Standards & Technology
> Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
> 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8264                Tel: +1 301-975-3528
> Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8264                FAX: +1 301-975-4694
> _______________________________________________
> wg11 mailing list
> wg11 at steptools.com
> http://lists.steptools.com/mailman/listinfo/wg11
>