[wg11] RE: P28ed2 in Bath

[Ricardo Goncalves]

  Should you consider the experience from AP236 could be interesting to
report, we would be very happy to participate.

  Please confirm.

  Thank you

  With regards

    Ricardo Goncalves
    On behalf of the AP236 team




> 
> -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Loffredo [mailto:loffredo at steptools.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:39 PM
> > To: wg3 at tc184-sc4.org; wg11 at steptools.com; expressIF at tc184-sc4.org; 
> > step-imp at steptools.com; step-manufacturing at steptools.com; 
> wg12 at tc184- 
> > sc4.org; xmlsc4 at nist.gov
> > Subject: Use cases for XML/P28e2
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Howard> I suggest that WG11 takes the lead in scheduling a session 
> > Howard> during the Bath meeting.
> > 
> > The session will be Wednesday 10:30-12pm.  See below.
> > 
> > Standards tend to be written by the folks who show up.  The WG11 
> > projects typically draw few participants, so these discussions have 
> > been very helpful in uncovering new requirements and viewpoints.
> > 
> > In that light, we will structure the meeting to make sure 
> we hear and 
> > can address the requirements of the AP developers.  From 
> the voices I 
> > have heard so far, the groups who seem to have requirements are:
> > 
> > 	- AP-239/PLCS
> > 	- AP-238
> > 	- AP-210
> > 	- Part 28 team
> > 
> > Gerry and I suggest a format whereby each group has 10 minutes to 
> > outline their requirements, followed by an open 40 minute 
> discussion 
> > to explore a course forward for addressing those needs.
> > 
> > The session will be Wednesday 10:30-12pm as describe.  This 
> slot was 
> > previously scheduled for the implementors forum so hopefully we can 
> > draw participants from the WG3, WG11, WG12, and implementor groups.
> > 
> > WG11 projects often take great pains to support the "entire EXPRESS 
> > community" which presumably includes private, stand-alone or ad-hoc 
> > EXPRESS models.  This is certainly of merit, and not to be ignored.
> > 
> > However, I remind the members of our small working group that the 
> > widest use of WG11 standards are in the context of APs.  An 
> AP is not 
> > necessarily just "one more EXPRESS model" and we must give 
> equal, if 
> > not greater, weight to these needs as well.
> > 
> > 				- Dave (WG11 Convenor)
> 
> 
> -- 
> **************************************************************
> **********
>  Dr. Herve PANETTO
>  Associate Professor
>  Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy
>  Research Centre For Automatic Control
>  Ecole Supérieure d'Informatique et Applications de Lorraine  
> Université Henri Poincaré Nancy I
> 
>  CRAN CNRS UMR 7039	 | Telephone: +33 (0) 3836 84426
>  Faculte des Sciences	 | Fax: +33 (0) 3836 84437
> 			 | Mobile: +33 (0) 661626175
>  BP 239			 | E-mail: 
> Herve.Panetto at cran.uhp-nancy.fr
>  F54506 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy | Web: http://www.cran.uhp-nancy.fr
> 			           : http://www.esial.uhp-nancy.fr
> **************************************************************
> **********
> 
> 
> 
>