[wg11-owl] Re: Paper: Criticism of the STEP ApplicationModule approach

[ewallace at cme.nist.gov]

David Leal wrote:
>Dear Ed,
>
>I agree.  Let's do it.
>
>Ray and I had a go with part 42, which is probably the best defined of the
>IRs and one which is not re-defined by the APs. Even so there are a few
>unexpected results.

Are you willing to share these results?  I'd like to have a look.

-Evan

Evan K. Wallace
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
NIST