[wg11-owl] Goal of the review

[David Price]

As a start, there are multiple ways in which OWL might be used by SC4. As
OWL is built on RDFS and RDF, it may also be appropriate to consider some
use of those languages as well.

Seems like there are at least four uses:

1 - As a language for defining general purpose, universal semantic
repositories similar to what 15926 provides for the Oil and Gas industry.

2 - As a language for defining taxonomies to be used with the External_class
modules in STEP, etc.

3 - As a modeling language for domain-specific ontologies (i.e. schemas) as
done in STEP today, Mandate, etc.

4 - As an implementation language with the concepts of Class, Property and
Individual, standard XML and other encodings, industry query languages, and
industry APIs.

1, 3 and maybe some cases of 4 enable the use of reasoners, etc. too.

Anyone think of any other uses?

To my knowledge, OWL is not "deployed" anywhere in SC4. It is being used in
OASIS standardiziation for use 2 with AP239.

DP

-----Original Message-----
From: wg11-owl-bounces at steptools.com [mailto:wg11-owl-bounces at steptools.com]
On Behalf Of Dave Loffredo
Sent: 26 May 2005 17:00
To: wg11-owl at steptools.com
Subject: [wg11-owl] Goal of the review



Hi all, 

Dave> "SC 4 requests WG11 to conduct a review of the deployment of OWL 
Dave> technology in SC 4, with contributions from the other WGs, and 
Dave> make recommendations for its consistent use."

Based on the original SC4 resolution, I would expect the end result of these
discussions to be a brief WG11 white paper summarizing the current usages
and your feelings on where things should go.  Obviously, Spain is 
a bit close, but hopefully you can have something by the next meeting.

Cheers, 
						- Dave


_______________________________________________
wg11-owl mailing list
wg11-owl at steptools.com http://lists.steptools.com/mailman/listinfo/wg11-owl