[step-manufacturing] Minutes of the Stockholm meeting June 11-15 2012
Martin Hardwick
hardwick at steptools.com
Tue Jul 17 10:18:26 EDT 2012
ISO STEP Meeting.
Stockholm, Sweden
June 11th to 15th
Attendees
First name Last name Organisation Country
Alain Brail Albavis France
Alexandre Fournier Boost-Conseil France
Patrick Marchand CETIM France
Lothar Klein LKSoftWare GmbH Germany
Doron Cohen ISCAR LTD. Israel
Fumiki Tanaka Hokkaido University Japan online
Dong Hoon Lee Korea Database Agency Republic of Korea
Sung Joon Lim Korea Database Agency Republic of Korea
Jonas Nordström Jonor Sweden
Andreas Archenti KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Christer Wickman KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Danfang Chen KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Gunilla Sivard KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Jonny Gustafsson KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Lars Lindberg KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Linus Persson KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Magnus Lundgren KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Mikael Hedlind KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Qiuling Huang KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Torsten Kjellberg KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Yujiang Li KTH Royal Institute of Technology Sweden
Bengt Olsson Sandvik Coromant Sweden
Linda Estman Sandvik Coromant Sweden
Susanne Wretlind Sandvik Coromant Sweden
Sune Horkeby Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB Sweden
Ian Stroud EPFL École Polytechnique Fédérale De Lausanne Switzerland
Aydin Nassehi University of Bath UK
Fred Proctor NIST US online
Ronnie Fesperman NIST US online
Bob Erickson Pratt & Whitney US online
David Loffredo STEP Tools Inc. US
Martin Hardwick STEP Tools Inc. US
Leon Xu The Boeing Company US
Sid Venkatesh The Boeing Company US
The meeting results are presented at:
http://www.steptools.com/library/stepnc/2012_stockholm/
Monday June 11th
--------------------------
We discussed the modeling of semantic tolerances for distributed
assemblies. The key issue is how to represent a semantic tolerance when
the constrained faces are in different file(s) to the tolerances. Two
solutions were discussed and will be tested in the coming months.
1 Use different information models for the two cases so that a tolerance
is represented using one set of entities when the faces are in a
different file, and a different set of entities when they are in the
same file.
2. Extend Part 21 to include a new section that models the references in
to and out of a file as URI's so that the same representation can be
used for both internal and external tolerances.
Tuesday June 12th
-------------------------
We began the discussion of CAM to CAM data exchange that continued on
Friday.
Thursday June 14th
---------------------------
The meeting was held in the XPRES Manufacturing Research Laboratories
(www.xpres.se) of KTH. Many thanks to Professor Torsten Kjellberg, Dr.
Gunilla Sivard and their team for letting us use their excellent
research facilities.
The scenario planned at the beginning of the project was demonstrated.
Multiple CAD and CAM systems were used to build the STEP data defined by
the STEP and STEP-NC standards. Videos showing how KTH made the data
have been placed on the demonstration web page. Custom systems were used
to "fill in the gaps" where a commercial translator was not yet
available. They created PMI data for the tolerances, kinematic and
accuracy data for the machine, and catalog data for the cutting tools.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efNy7P3wLQ4&feature=youtu.be
The machining accuracy demonstration showed how to predict the accuracy
of a machine tool for a particular part in a particular setup by
measuring the loaded and unloaded accuracy of a machine tool. The
unloaded accuracy was measured as per the ISO 230 specifications and
represented both as ASME B 5.59-2 and STEP data. The loaded accuracy was
predicted using a loaded double ball bar test developed by KTH and tool
force load software developed by Boeing.
The results were good with a strong correlation between the accuracy
predictions and the measured part tolerances, but further testing is
necessary because of differences in the predicted and measured accuracy
of the Y axis.
Other demonstrations showed the usage of a holographic table to view the
motions of a machine tool with data loaded from JavaScript on the STEP
Tools web site.
http://www.steptools.com/demos/stepnc.html
The definition of tool changer motions was shown by exporting the
kinematics from NX using one of the custom translators developed by KTH.
The data was loaded into a viewer to verify and execute the STEP
kinematics.
ftp://www.steptools.com/private/Stockholm2/mach-viewer.zip
The definition of PMI for a cutting tool assembly was demonstrated by
assembling components from two tool vendors (ISCAR and Sandvik
Coromant). Tolerances were then added to the assembly using NX. A tool
developed by KTH associated the tolerances with the properties defined
by ISO 13399. The result was then exported as an AP242 file and viewed
in ST-Machine and a STEP viewer developed by LKSoft.
ftp://www.steptools.com/private/Stockholm2/T1_cutting_tool_assembly_100_AP242.stp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKqmrVn5ubE&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUghssxjqkw&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZ_IHFuFFo8&feature=youtu.be
Friday June 15th
-----------------------
We continued the discussions on CAM to CAM data exchange. We agreed to
make a presentation to the CAM vendors at the IMTS show on Thursday
September 13th. The presentation must emphasize the value proposition
for vendors and users. An invitation letter was drafted and reviewed.
ftp://www.steptools.com/private/CAM_exchange/CAM_Plan.pptx
We discussed the next steps. Mikael Hedlind suggested that a STEP-NC
Notepad should be developed to enable the development and editing of
toolpaths. We reviewed the STEP cloud architecture and made changes to
reflect the harmonization of AP242 and AP238.
ftp://www.steptools.com/private/CAM_exchange/STEP_cloud.pptx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.steptools.com/pipermail/step-manufacturing/attachments/20120717/edda46a9/attachment.html>
More information about the step-manufacturing
mailing list