[step-manufacturing] Meeting that affects AP-238 and AP-240

Martin Hardwick hardwick at steptools.com
Tue Jun 15 14:02:52 EDT 2004


All,

Wg12 has been asked to look at how process data is mapped
into the integrated resources. 

I have asked the Wg12 Convenor how long this might delay
the publication of our AP's and he has given the response
below.

Martin Hardwick

PS. I will be sending out an updated meeting schedule later
    this week. 

>Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:22:21 -0500
>From: "Hunten, Keith A" <keith.a.hunten at lmco.com>
>Subject: RE: keiths message
>To: Martin Hardwick <hardwick at steptools.com>
>Thread-Topic: keiths message
>Thread-Index: AcRS9FzNuJhRqn10SfyhQGls/Ip1HgAAAkrQ
>X-MS-Has-Attach: 
>X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2004 16:22:22.0154 (UTC) FILETIME=[EFC772A0:01C452F4]
>X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.62 (2004-01-11) on bfg.steptools.com
>X-Spam-Level: 
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
>        version=2.62
>
>Martin -
>
>I really cannot answer this without seeing both sides of the story and
>understanding them completely.  I'm not sure how much time between now
>and Bath I will have to study this - therefore a realistic answer will
>be after the Wednesday meeting.
>
>The delay will be contingent on the successful completion of the
>integration - and the subsequent updates of 238 and 240.
>
>The completion of integration will in large part be paced by the
>contributions of the participants.  I strongly doubt we can complete it
>in Bath.
>
>Keith
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Hardwick [mailto:hardwick at steptools.com] 
>Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 11:17 AM
>To: Hunten, Keith A
>Subject: Fwd: keiths message
>
>
>
>Keith,
>
>For planning purposes could you please estimate how long this process
>will take and in particular do you anticipate that it will
>
>1. Delay the publication of the AP-238 DIS
>2. Delay the publication of the AP-240 IS
>
>and if so by how long, or contingent on what event?
>
>Martin
>
>>Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:28:45 -0400
>>From: Dave Loffredo <loffredo at steptools.com>
>>To: hardwick at steptools.com
>>Subject: keiths message
>>X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
>>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.62 (2004-01-11) on 
>>bfg.steptools.com
>>X-Spam-Level: 
>>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
>autolearn=ham 
>>        version=2.62
>>
>>
>>It wasn't sent to you ...
>>
>>------------------------------
>>>From keith.a.hunten at lmco.com Mon Jun 14 14:21:01 2004
>>Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:04:02 -0500
>>From: "Hunten, Keith A" <keith.a.hunten at lmco.com>
>>Subject: ISO 14649 and 10303 WG12 Integration Workshop
>>To: fredglant at hispeed.ch, ian.stroud at epfl.ch, Len <slovensky at scra.org>,
>>        Dave Loffredo <loffredo at steptools.com>
>>Cc: meinolf.groepper at vdma.org,
>>        "Mason, Howard (UK)" <howard.mason at baesystems.com>
>>
>>
>>All -
>>Finally, as promised, Howard Mason has at last managed to discuss with 
>>SC1 Chair Peter Mueller the proposed integration workshop approach to 
>>addressing the harmonization and integration of 14649 manufacturing 
>>model with the 10303 Integrated Resources (IRs). Peter Mueller is in 
>>agreement that we (10303 and 14649) should accept the results of the 
>>technical assessment of the information requirements of the model.
>>The agreed approach to the technical assessment is that as WG12
>Convener
>>I will hold a series of workshops to walk through the 14649 document
>and
>>perform the integration with the 10303 IRs.  From prior experience this
>>is a multi-pass task that requires the document to be updated several
>>times until a consensus is reached.
>>I propose that the first pass at the Integration begin on Wednesday
>>afternoon July 7 during the WG12 Plenary at the ISO TC184/SC4 meeting
>in
>>Bath, UK.
>>All of the addressed are encouraged to attend, and to invite others
>that
>>you feel have an interest.
>>All potential attendees please confirm with me.
>>It would be also very useful for me to have a current copy of 14649 and
>>any pertinent 10303 documentation that applies to this task.
>>
>>I apologize for the very late notice.
>>
>>
>>Keith Hunten
>>ISO TC184/SC4/WG12 Convener




More information about the step-manufacturing mailing list